Leader of the illegal coup regime in Honduras, Roberto Micheletti , has announced that he is willing to sign an agreement that creates a power-sharing government and will require both sides to recognise the result of November’s presidential poll.
President Zelaya [PICTURED], who was ousted by a military coup on 28th June and is currently in sanctuary in the Brazilian Embassy says that the deal, which requires the approval of the Supreme Court and Congress, will be signed on Friday.
This is a major victory for the popular movement. The people of Honduras have never accepted the legitimacy of the coup government, and Micheletti’s gangsters have now been forced to restore Zelaya to office. The November election will therefore take place in the context of successful popular radicalism that has forced concessions from the Oligarchs.
Importantly, the coup in Honduras has dramatically failed to provide a precedent for the right wing to remove progressive elected governments in the Americas.
The crucial next step is that Zelaya, back in the presidential palace, ensures that the army are taken off the streets, and the independent anti-coup media are allowed to broadcast again. This will ensure that the return to democracy allows a truly fair election next month.
Derek Wall on said:
Good news, in Latin America workers, peasants and indigenous people are getting together building powerful political organisations and creating socialism.
Some lessons for the British left here, I think.
Credit to Green Left Weekly and 21s Century for spreading the word about this, you can’t rely on the Guardian.
Derek WallQuote text Reply
Benjamin on said:
The Latin American left, of different hues, still have come cojones.
BenjaminQuote text Reply
John on said:
Encouraging news. Hasta la victoria siempre
JohnQuote text Reply
little black sister on said:
This is a serious victory for the left.
Ongoing reports here: http://committeeagainsthondurascoup.blogspot.com/
little black sisterQuote text Reply
christian h. on said:
Sounds like great news – anybody know the fine print?
christian h.Quote text Reply
johng on said:
It also surely does (wait for brickbats) signal a shifting stance in US hegenomy in the region. The coup was clearly carried out by the fagend of the old order in Latin America, with or without the covert support of similar elements in the US administration.
johngQuote text Reply
John on said:
http://upsidedownworld.org/main/content/view/2185/68/ – this is an informative and moving short film. It argues that the oligarchy, while partially retreating, has blocked the moves towards a new constitution. But the struggle continues.
JohnQuote text Reply
Lucy hallett on said:
Now, if we can only all ignore this…
“TEGUCIGALPA, Oct 29 (IPS) – At the urging of a high-level U.S. government mission, the negotiating teams of ousted Honduran President Manuel Zelaya and de facto leader Roberto Micheletti restarted talks Thursday to find a solution to the four-month political crisis.”
http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=49065
Lucy hallettQuote text Reply
anon 3 on said:
surely its quite a big case of wait and see?
anon 3Quote text Reply
anon 3 on said:
ps: any more news on this?
anon 3Quote text Reply
Lee on said:
Honduran National Front of Resistance to the Coup on deal to restore Zelaya.
http://committeeagainsthondurascoup.blogspot.com/2009/10/honduran-national-front-of-resistance.html
The National Front of Resistance to the Coup d’Etát, facing the imminent signing of a negotiated agreement between the commission representing the legitimate President Manuel Zelaya Rosales and the representatives of the de facto regime, communicates the following to the Honduran people and the international community:
1. We celebrate the upcoming restoration of President Manuel Zelaya Rosales as a popular victory over the narrow interests of the coup oligarchy. This victory has been obtained through four months of struggle and sacrifice by the people who, in spite of the savage repression unleashed by the repressive forces of the state in the hands of the dominant class, have been able to resist and grow in their levels of consciousness and organization and turn themselves into an irrepressible social force.
2. The signing on the part of the dictatorship of the document which mandates “returning the holder of executive power to its pre June 28 state,” represents the explicit acceptance that in Honduras there was a coup d’état that should be dismantled in order to return to institutional order and guarantee a democratic framework in which the people can exercise their right to transform society.
3. We demand that the accords signed at the negotiating table be processed in an expedited fashion by the National Congress. We alert all our comrades at the national level so that they can join the actions to pressure for the immediate compliance with the contents of the final document from the negotiating table.
4. We reiterate that a National Constituent Assembly is an unrenounceable aspiration of the Honduran people and a non-negotiable right for which we will continue struggling in the streets, until we achieve the re-founding of our society to convert it into one that is just, egalitarian and truly democratic.
“At 125 days of struggle, nobody here surrenders!”
Tegucigalpa, M.D.C. October 30, 2009
LeeQuote text Reply
Eliot Ramsey on said:
“Credit to Green Left Weekly”
Indeed. It’s an amazing publication. It comes out every week, and is distributed across the entire continet of Australia! A richly produced, beautifully designed publication, scores of pages of news every edition.
Also, it carries no advertising at all. And is cost free to the public.
Often, the only source of current news from Cuba and Venezuela. And consistently socialist in its presentation.
Eliot RamseyQuote text Reply
Fleabite on said:
Honduras: the farcical agreement is exposed – boycott the elections!
Written by Jorge Martín
Monday, 16 November 2009
In a previous article we pointed to the fact that the Tegucigalpa/San José Accord signed on October 30 was a farce. Events have now confirmed that we were right. To accept the agreement now would be a betrayal of the mass movement. What is required now is an active boycott, combined with mass mobilisation for the overthrow of the present illegitimate regime.
As we explained in a previous article, the Tegucigalpa/San José Accord signed on October 30 by representatives of the legitimate president of Honduras, Mel Zelaya, and those of the coup regime of Micheletti, was in reality a farce.
The text of the agreement was already quite bad (even though it was presented as a victory by Mel Zelaya and some of the leaders of the Resistance), but at least it contained one clause which talked of the reinstatement of president Zelaya, who had been removed by a military coup on June 28. However, in reality, the oligarchy had no intention of implementing that point and very soon started more trickery.
As we already warned, the text of the agreement left the question of Zelaya’s reinstatement to the National Congress which could also consult the Supreme Court of Justice. This was clearly a trap, since both Congress and the Supreme Court had given “legitimacy” to the coup in June. As a matter of fact the presidency of the Congress (which is not in session now because of the elections called for November 29) decided to consult the Supreme Court and other bodies, thus delaying the decision on Zelaya.
Meanwhile, coup president Micheletti decided to get his government to resign… and then appoint the same people again to the National Unity and Reconciliation government which included no representatives from Zelaya. The farce was complete. To this date the Supreme Court has not yet responded to the report requested by Congress.
But none of this could have worked, or at least could not have had any shred of legitimacy, had it not been for the position of the US, which made it clear that regardless of the decision of Congress on the issue of Zelaya being reinstated, they would recognise the November 29 elections.
In a very interesting article written by Tomás Andino, one of the leading figures of the Resistance and member of parliament for the left-wing Democratic Unification party (UD), he put it clearly: “The Tegucigalpa agreement, far from being a ‘victory’, means the surrender of President Zelaya. The agreement has been written on the terms of the empire. It is a pity that Mel swallowed the hook, and authorised the signature of the agreement… The question is that even though he has signed, the empire has made it clear that they will accept ‘any decision taken by the Honduran Congress’, which means that it is likely that they will not accept the reinstatement before the electoral farce of November 29, to prevent damaging it.”
Boycott the elections
Faced with this situation, the National Resistance Front has decided to boycott the elections on November 29. Trade union candidate Carlos H. Reyes, after consulting the rank and file of his organisation, decided to make a clear statement withdrawing from the elections and calling for boycott. A number of candidates from other parties (Liberal, PINU and others) have also decided to withdraw from the elections.
The situation with the left-wing Unificación Democrática, however, is a bit more complicated. The leadership of the party is divided in two wings. One, the official wing, led by Cesar Ham, has an openly opportunistic stance, arguing that they have to stay in the electoral process in order to keep their electoral registration.
There is also the issue of the 4 million lempiras in state political funding that they would lose if they were to boycott the election. This is clearly a position of betrayal of the resistance movement. Members and activists of UD have participated actively in the resistance movement and at least 6 of their members have been killed for their part in the movement. The Cesar Ham wing of UD are clearly treacherous opportunists, more worried about their jobs and money than about the principles they claim to stand for.
There is another wing of UD, led by Renan Valdez and Tomás Andino, amongst others, who call themselves the Genuine Leadership of UD, which has come out clearly against the elections and for boycott. They have made an appeal to the rank and file of UD to prevent the party from supporting the electoral farce. They argue, correctly, that: “to participate in the fraudulent elections would contribute to give legitimacy to the coup regime and will create more difficult conditions for the defeat of the new government, which would mean that UD would become its accomplice”.
We could say that the negotiations and the so-called agreement have played the role they were intended to: create confusion in the resistance movement and give some degree of “legitimacy” to the elections called by the coup regime. Washington has already said that they will recognise the result of the elections as legitimate. That wing of the US state apparatus that was always supportive of the coup has won, against those who, even though they shared the aims of the coup, did not necessarily agree with the methods used.
Now at least the situation has become clear to the mass movement: the only way to defeat the coup is through mass mobilisations, not through negotiations. As Tomás Andino puts it correctly: “The only thing that can save the situation is for the Peoples’ Resistance to break the ice, first of all refusing to recognise the Tegucigalpa Agreement and mobilising to prevent the electoral farce of the oligarchy on November 29… In this way we would prevent the agreement from fulfilling one of its main aims which is to legitimise the coup through elections, and only in this way we would have conditions for a defeat of the coup regime in the medium term and achieve the aim of our struggle: the Constituent Assembly.”
This is a very similar perspective to what we put forward on October 28: “In order to move forward and continue the struggle it needs to start by clearly rejecting negotiations with the regime and then move to organise a serious campaign against the November 29 elections. The elections should be boycotted across the board because they are called by an illegitimate regime in conditions of brutal repression. This boycott should be organised through a massive campaign of political explanation in the neighbourhoods, building up to mass demonstrations and a meticulously-prepared general strike.”
As we said then: “The courageous movement of the Honduran masses over the last four months has not been in vain. It has created powerful organisational structures and links between the active layer and the masses. The mass movement has had a taste of its own power and strength. Above all, the level of consciousness has experienced a giant leap. None of this will be wasted, no matter what happens in the next few weeks.
None of the fundamental problems facing the Honduran masses have been resolved, and they cannot be resolved within the limits of capitalism, so there is no alternative but to continue the struggle. It is necessary to group the most advanced activists of the movement into an organisation based on the ideas of Marxism. Within the movement of the Honduran workers, the Marxists will fight to give the marvellous energy of the revolutionary struggle of the masses a far-sighted and decisive leadership that can take it to victory.”
FleabiteQuote text Reply