Who will save us from America?

img_0169The first two US presidential debates did not reveal anything new when it comes to either candidate. They only served to confirm that Donald Trump is a slobbering megalomaniac who should be kept away from political office in the same way a three-year-old child is kept away from a box of matches. A poster boy for unfettered capitalism, he is a man so divorced from reality — and, with it, his own humanity —that every word that leaves his mouth comes over as a cry for help.

Hillary Clinton, meanwhile, is a passionate disciple of US exceptionalism – someone who believes there is no country that cannot be improved with a shower of cruise and tomahawk missiles. She and her husband come as a package of liberal opportunism who have made a successful and hugely lucrative career out of speaking left and acting right. The fruits of this opportunism are mass incarceration, the entrenchment of Wall Street as the golden temple of the US economy, and perpetual war and regime change overseas. Christopher Hitchens perhaps put it best when he opined that they [the Clintons] “haven’t met a foreign political donor they don’t like and haven’t taken from.”

Such is the parlous quality of both candidates for an office which, even in its better years, is synonymous with war crimes and crimes against humanity, it is tempting to conclude that we’re fucked. I say this as a non-American given that the occupant of the White House is a matter of grave importance for a world by now grown weary of Washington’s vast and ongoing experiment in democracy, along with the moral sickness which fuels its untrammeled power and the doctrine of ‘destroying the village in order to save it’ that has long underpinned its foreign policy.

It begs the question of who will save us from America?

Writing these words while on a recent visit to Los Angeles, I was struck by the ocean of broken humanity that fills Hollywood’s mythical gilded streets. Anyone who believes that America is a classless society need only take him or herself over here to realize how utterly wrong they are. Indeed not only will they be assured that there is no society more defined by class than US society, but that every minute of a every day a fierce class war is raging in its towns and cities, with up to now only one side in this war, the 99 percent, taking all the punches and doing all the bleeding.

Across America the abandonment of the poor, the downtrodden and the sick to their fate in service to the rich has been so brutal and cruel that its human consequences given new meaning to Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth. America’s poor are a colonized people, be assured, which is why Malcolm’s assertion that, “You can’t understand what’s going on in Mississippi if you don’t understand what’s going on in the Congo,” remains one of his most cogent.

Yet as much as I loathe America for the scale of injustice, brutality, and mendacity that informs its treatment of the poor at home and abroad, hope arrives in the tremendous litany of rebels, dissidents, and counter-hegemonic movements which the country has produced in response. Oppression breeds resistance and throughout US history there has been fierce resistance against overwhelming odds — Sitting Bull, Nat Turner, Denmark Vesey, the San Patricios, Frederick Douglas, John Brown, Mother Jones, Big Bill Haywood and the Wobblies, Eugene Debs, the Abraham Lincoln Brigade, MLK, Malcolm X, SNCC, the Panthers, anti-Vietnam War movement, Cesar Chavez, and on and on.

Each of them, along with the movements they led or were a part of, were sustained by the same fierce moral outrage at the injustice they experienced and witnessed being inflicted in the name of progress and might is right. Many people experience at some level and point this burning sense of moral outrage at the injustice that defines the world they live in. The difference arises between those who learn to make their peace with it and those who refuse to make their peace with it – who instead choose to grapple with this monster in what they know before they start will be a losing fight.

This is the human condition at its most inspiring, the willingness to fight even while knowing you can’t win. But, then, such a reductive and one dimensional interpretation of victory has no place when we understand history as a river that flows without end and not a monument separating it into neat and tidy chapters, as in a book. Fighting is winning and winning is fighting in a struggle that will continue so long as injustice continues.

The race for the White House is a race for power engaged in by those Chaplin famously described as “machine men with machine minds and machine hearts.” It is a contest between two representatives of a psychopathic ruling class for the keys to a kingdom of despair. But lest they allow themselves to become smug and complacent as they wallow in lives of privilege and decadence, they should hark the words of Crazy Horse, spoken days before he died while resisting imprisonment. “The Red Nation shall rise again and it shall be a blessing for a sick world; a world filled with broken promises, selfishness and separations; a world longing for light again.”

Amen.

7 comments on “Who will save us from America?

  1. Jellytot on said:

    I have just been offered a job in Monrovia, CA under the TN visa program.

    After reading John’s description of Los Angeles I am tempted to turn it down.

  2. Andy Newman on said:

    Good article John, i must admit the prospect of Hilary Clinton as president fills me with dread. She is the lesser evil, but still evil.

  3. Jellytot on said:

    Andy Newman,

    HRC will win (Trump’s campaign is Dead in the Water – complete and utter implosion).

    The Dems are very confident and are going for the Big Win. Their Blue states are now locked down and they are pouring millions of ad dollars into previously solid Republican States like Arizona and Georgia in order to flip them. That’s confidence.

    Her presidency will be a case of the “same old, same old”. No different that Obama’s.

  4. Jellytot: Her presidency will be a case of the “same old, same old”. No different that Obama’s.

    I have to disagree. She is far more hawkish than Obama. The very real prospect of direct military confrontation with Russia, China and/or Iran moves closer with her in the White House.

    I agree that Trump has imploded, but the Wikileaks emails leave no doubt that Clinton poses a danger to us all.

  5. Jellytot on said:

    John,

    Yes John, maybe, but I think it will be a case of “wait and see”.

    I still think, post Iraq, that she will be loathe to commit large numbers of ground troops to the Middle East – air power and special forces are surely still the way to go to them. Obviously still horrible for the civilians on the receiving end.

    Just as Vietnam mollified US military interventionism up to the 1st Gulf War in 1991 so Iraq will make the US pull back from committing massive numbers of conventional Ground for at least another decade.

    Back to the election, after last night’s final debate (where Trump turned his petulant “man child” shtick up to 11) the predictions now are for a “Goldwater 1964″ style drubbing for the GOP with Trump just winning the ” Red L” – the deep south States (Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana etc.) and up the “fly over” states – Oklahoma, Wyoming, Idaho etc. (where hardly anyone actually lives).

    Even Texas (yes, Texas!) and Arizona may go Blue.

    Also Trump, like a rotten apple, may stink up the whole barrel and affect down ballot races for Senate and House where the GOP may lose big. Predict a complete reset for the GOP in the coming years – Trump may go off and do a Third Party right wing ‘tin foil hat’ populist thing.

  6. Jellytot on said:

    Jellytot:
    John,

    Yes John, maybe, but I think it will be a case of “wait and see”.

    I still think, post Iraq, that she will be loathe to commit large numbers of ground troops to the Middle East – air power and special forces are surely still the way to go to them. Obviously still horrible for the civilians on the receiving end.

    Just as Vietnam mollified large scale US military interventionism up to the 1st Gulf War in 1991 so Iraq will make the US pull back from committing massive numbers of conventional Ground for at least another decade.

    Back to the election, after last night’s final debate (where Trump turned his petulant “man child” shtick up to 11) the predictions now are for a “Goldwater 1964″ style drubbing for the GOP with Trump just winning the ” Red L” – the deep south States (Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana etc.) and up the “fly over” states – Oklahoma, Wyoming, Idaho etc. (where hardly anyone actually lives).

    Even Texas (yes, Texas!) and Arizona may go Blue.

    Also Trump, like a rotten apple, may stink up the whole barrel and affect down ballot races for Senate and House where the GOP may lose big. Predict a complete reset for the GOP in the coming years – Trump may go off and do a Third Party right wing ‘tin foil hat’ populist thing.

  7. John: I have to disagree. She is far more hawkish than Obama. The very real prospect of direct military confrontation with Russia, China and/or Iran moves closer with her in the White House.

    Agreed, I recently read Bob Woodward’s “Obama’s wars” and the role that Clinton played as secretary of state was to destablise Obama’s policy in Afghanistan which was aimed at reducing troop numbers and withdrawing, and at every point Clinton acted duplicitously to aid the most hawkish military opinions from the Pentagon